im talking like， you know， impractical calculations like， if you have an indifferent card of the strength x， whats the probability of winning if ur the dealer and you have players of the number of N?
WinPn{DL;1;Indx}={(28+x)P(n-1)}/{(59)P(n-1)}
an equation i found.
or， other stuff like
WinPn{DL;1;Trx}=WinPn{DL;1;x}
well， the thing is that neo actually decided his topic something kinda similar to this. you know， pointless calculations just for fun. but thats not the point right? the point is that WE BOTH LIKE IT.
and he kinda admits it in a subliminal way.
whateva tho.
wzrdlgy， semi， and this IT presentation.
一本の線に繋が…らない
はい
cya-
WinPn{DL;1;Indx}={(28+x)P(n-1)}/{(59)P(n-1)}
an equation i found.
or， other stuff like
WinPn{DL;1;Trx}=WinPn{DL;1;x}
well， the thing is that neo actually decided his topic something kinda similar to this. you know， pointless calculations just for fun. but thats not the point right? the point is that WE BOTH LIKE IT.
and he kinda admits it in a subliminal way.
whateva tho.
wzrdlgy， semi， and this IT presentation.
一本の線に繋が…らない
はい
cya-
コメント